|
Due to family BS they still haven’t buried James Brown |
| January 10th, 2007 under Unadmirable People. [ Comments: none ]
|
|

The body of soul singer James Brown has yet to be buried as attorneys and his children work to settle issues surrounding his estate, including where he will be laid to rest. For now, his body lies in a sealed casket in his home on Beech Island, said Charles Reid, manager of the C.A. Reid Funeral Home in Augusta, Ga., which handled the services. Brown died of heart failure Dec. 25 at age 73. His will has yet to be filed, said Buddy Dallas, an attorney for the singer. The room where Brown’s body lies is being kept at a controlled temperature, and security guards keep watch, Reid said. The funeral home delivered Brown’s body after services Dec. 30, Reid said. Brown’s home has been locked since hours after his death to protect his memorabilia, furnishing, clothes and other personal items, Dallas said. "Just imagine what would have happened," Dallas said. "Items of James Brown would have left there like items off the shelves of Macy’s in an after-Christmas sale." The trustees for his will, along with Brown’s children, will determine the burial site, Dallas said. Tomi Rae Hynie, Brown’s partner, said shortly after his death that she encountered locked gates as she tried to get into the home she says she shared with the singer and their 5-year-old son. She wouldn’t discuss the incident Tuesday, but her lawyer said Hynie should be granted access to the home, although he would not talk about whether Hynie might take legal action. "The hope is that all parties can sit down and figure out what the problem is and what the challenges are," attorney Thornton Morris said. "And once we figure out what the challenges are we’ll see if we can’t resolve something that’s a win for everybody."
AJC
That is just so sad, his family and the lawyers should be ashamed. I can’t wait for Jesse Jackson and Rev Al Sharpton to get involved in this because you know they will be vocal about this and imagine what they are going to say. And worse comes to worse maybe Michael Jackson can make a bid on his remains, I am sure that would get the family to put him 6 feet under.
|
|
Round 2: New Line Cinema vs LOTR’s Peter Jackson |
| January 10th, 2007 under Lawsuits. [ Comments: none ]
|
|
In the latest comment in the controversy surrounding a proposed movie based on J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Hobbit, New Line head Robert Shaye told SCI FI Wire in no uncertain terms that the studio won’t work with Lord of the Rings director Peter Jackson on that film or any other film. Ever. At least not as long as Shaye is in charge. Shaye’s comments marked the first time a New Line executive has commented publicly on the fracas since Jackson announced that he has pulled out of the project and also appears to harden New Line’s position against Jackson. "I do not want to make a movie with somebody who is suing me," Shaye—New Line’s chief executive officer—said in an interview on Jan. 5 while promoting The Last Mimzy, a New Line family fantasy that marks his first time in a director’s chair since 1990’s Book of Love. "It will never happen during my watch." Jackson had told TheOneRing.net in November that he and partner Fran Walsh were bowing out after New Line, which produced the Rings films and has production rights to The Hobbit, told them the studio was moving ahead with the project without them. Jackson has said he won’t discuss The Hobbit until a lawsuit against New Line over Rings accounting practices was settled. As far as Shaye is concerned, Jackson is no longer welcome. "There’s a kind of arrogance," Shaye said. "Not that I don’t think Peter is a good filmmaker and that he hasn’t contributed significantly to filmography and made three very good movies. And I don’t even expect him to say ‘thank you’ for having me make it happen and having New Line make it happen. But to think that I, as a functionary in [a] company that has been around for a long time, but is now owned by a very big conglomerate, would care one bit about trying to cheat the guy, … he’s either had very poor counsel or is completely misinformed and myopic to think that I care whether I give him [anything]." Shaye, who was also an executive producer on the Rings films, added: "He got a quarter of a billion dollars paid to him so far, justifiably, according to contract, completely right, and this guy, who already has received a quarter of a billion dollars, turns around without wanting to have a discussion with us and sues us and refuses to discuss it unless we just give in to his plan. I don’t want to work with that guy anymore. Why would I? So the answer is he will never make any movie with New Line Cinema again while I’m still working for the company." Shaye said that many of the Rings trilogy actors "suddenly, because, I’m guessing, of Peter’s complaint," have declined to participate in celebrating New Line’s 40th anniversary. "I’m incredibly offended," he said. "I don’t care about Peter Jackson anymore. He wants to have another $100 million or $50 million, whatever he’s suing us for. He doesn’t want to sit down and talk about it. He thinks that we owe him something after we’ve paid him over a quarter of a billion dollars. … Cheers, Peter." New Line’s hardened position against Jackson isn’t the end of the story, of course. MGM, which owns the distribution rights to The Hobbit, on Nov. 20 told Variety through a spokesman that "the matter of Peter Jackson directing the Hobbit films is far from closed." In his own online statement, Jackson said that New Line executive Mark Ordesky, who shepherded the Rings trilogy, argued that New Line is dumping Jackson because the studio has a "limited time option" on the film rights, obtained from Saul Zaentz.
Sci Fi Wire
I wonder how Peter Jackson feels to have something in common with Tom Cruise. It still amazes that me that he won an Oscar because I have seen his earier releases, but then again if Susan Saradon can do it any one can
|
|
Hot Links! |
| January 9th, 2007 under Hot Links!. [ Comments: none ]
|
|
Who is that recently married couple that look so in love? – ICYDK
Who is on Blackwell’s worst dressed list? – Dlisted
Fergie is just so Cosmopolitan – Yeeeah!
Doesn’t Kelly Clarkson sans makeup look a little like a teen boy?- pop on the pop
|
|
More production stills from Hairspray! |
| January 9th, 2007 under Hairspray. [ Comments: none ]
|
|
Whoever did the makeup and costumes on this movie should win the Oscar next year because so many of these stars are unrecgonizable! I still can’t believe that is Queen Latifa in the second picture, Michelle Pfieffer look amazing and doesn’t Zac Efron kind of look like a young Elvis? I can’t wait for this movie, but y’all know that!
|
|
Brooke Burke gives birth to Heaven Rain |
| January 9th, 2007 under David Hasselhoff/Baywatch. [ Comments: none ]
|
|
Rock Star: Supernova host Brooke Burke and her fiancé, former Baywatch star David Charvet, welcomed their first child on Monday at St. John’s hospital in Santa Monica, California, Us Weekly has learned. Daughter Heaven Rain Charvet is 6 pounds, 8 ounces, and 18 3/4 inches long. "Mother and baby are doing very well and are now resting comfortably at home," Burke’s rep tells Us. "Everything went well with the delivery, and Rain looks just like her mother." According to a source, Burke, 35, and Charvet, 34, chose the name because "rain grows everything." "She’s an amazing baby," says the source. "She almost never cries. She’s very quiet." The couple, who have been friends for several years, began dating in 2005 and became engaged in August of 2006. The new parents plan to marry this spring. Charvet tells Us, "I am the happiest man alive!" Burke, who also hosted E!’s popular travel show Wild On, was previously married to Extreme Makeover plastic surgeon Garth Fisher, with whom she has two daughters, Neriah, 6, and Sierra Sky, 4.
Us Weekly
WTF type of name is that? Seriously you can’t just randomly pick two things from nature and name your kid after them. Because how do Heaven and Rain go in a positive way? Granted in one my college classes we learned a Greek myth that when Heaven Rained down on earth it meant that well Heaven was done with Earth you know like in the Bibical way…so since that is how she was created maybe it wasn’t a bad thing.
|
| « Previous entries Next entries » |
|
|