What did the ’80s do to deserve this? |
September 10th, 2009 under Sex and the City. [ Comments: none ]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/968e5/968e5d34ba0771c33572182a2665ad7b79157912" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7088c/7088c729fab1d5767af07f9af440e1ec09105f7f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12403/124037969ca44e97389ed849614aa47aa51e7072" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/141f5/141f5cd2dc48479f841d3005f81cae25a7cdb270" alt=""
Splash News Online
So yesterday I posted pictures of Kim Cattrall getting her ’80s on for Sex and the City 2 and the last week I did the same for Sarah Jessica Parker. I was wishing and hoping and praying that it would stop there, but no… Now we are getting to see SJP in a Madonna look from the me decade and and Cynthia Nixon sporting a Howdy Dowdy wig for her flashback in time. I want to know what the ’80s and we did to deserve this. Seriously were those actresses such divas during the first movie that the people who worked on it were looking for a way to get back at them? Obviously Kristen Davis is their favorite because she looks exactly the same, but did we expect any different for her character’s younger look?
BTW just for this sacrilege that the movie has done for ’80s I am boycotting it and the first one too! Yeah that’s right I haven’t seen the Sex and the City movie and I proudly admit it!!!
|
Kim Cattrall gets her ’80s on |
September 9th, 2009 under Kim Cattrall, Sex and the City. [ Comments: 2 ]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/547ed/547ed231d79ec13ca54864066044ec8175353290" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67800/678007d3937291d5cd484037da73f17068d3ddf5" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e0ac/3e0accfc4484dcaa0d25eff3261d16173d3dba22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df158/df1584b01467d265cc889fa83e8f08ca0541fbcd" alt=""
Splash News Online
Last week we saw Sarah Jessica Parker get her ’80s on for the Sex and the City 2 movie and today we are seeing Kim Cattrall get her’s on. I am beginning to wonder if whoever is working on this movie really hates them because both of them look like sh!t. Seriously Samantha looks like a prostitute from the ’80s who would walk 42nd Street and I don’t think her character would like that comparison. Am I the only who thinks that these ’80s looks are revenge for something? Because no offense, but they are too old to do 25 year old flashbacks.
|
Caption Sarah Jessica Parker! |
September 5th, 2009 under Caption the Celeb, Sex and the City. [ Comments: 3 ]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e315/9e3157c6576f0fb920593f6eef30320e020a6bb0" alt=""
Splash News Online
This picture of Sarah Jessica Parker eating on the set of Sex and the City 2 has caption me written all over it, so go ahead and do it!
Winner of the last Caption The Celeb:
MTV Buzzworthy Blog wrote for Caption Katy Perry…”Mommmmy, Katy Perry has her lipstick out again!!!”
|
Who is having a bad ’80s hair day? |
September 1st, 2009 under Guess who?, Sex and the City. [ Comments: 1 ]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e7c3/7e7c32bd01721b533f2834d3c848385b4df3327b" alt=""
Want to see who looks a lot better from behind than they do from the front (and they are not looking good from behind) then click here!
|
Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick show off their twins |
June 29th, 2009 under Sex and the City. [ Comments: 2 ]
|
Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick are celebrating the one week birthday of their twin girls, Marion Loretta Elwell and Tabitha Hodge, by releasing a picture of them to AP. How awwwdorable is James Wilkie looking over at his baby sister! What a great family picture! Good for them for not selling their baby pictures like other celebrities!
|
« Previous entries Next entries » |