|
Divorce hard on Beatrice McCartney |
| September 2nd, 2006 under Paul McCartney/Heather Mills. [ Comments: none ]
|
|
It was supposed to be a blissful summer holiday for the little girl at the centre of the pop world’s most acrimonious divorce.Instead Sir Paul McCartney’s daughter, Beatrice, has become the talk of East Hampton, the chic seaside resort where the two-year-old spent several days with her father before being collected by his estranged wife, Heather, with whom she is spending the rest of her American holiday. The 64-year-old ex-Beatle arrived in East Hampton by helicopter two weeks ago and was collected by a security guard in an old truck. East Hampton’s fabulously wealthy residents were amazed when they began to see Sir Paul pedalling through the town’s quaint streets on a pushbike in the afternoons, towing Beatrice in a buggy."He was sweating heavily the first time I saw him," one said. "He had clearly come quite a distance and it was a very hot day."He took Beatrice to the local playground. Most kids go there with their nannies so it was quite something to see this multi-millionaire cycling there and pushing his little girl on the swings. He was very patient with her. She complained she was uncomfortable because she was wearing a wet swimming costume so he had her take it off and wrung it out."Another dad told me that the only help he had at home was a part-time chef. He looked after Beatrice himself which I assume will be a big plus for him if he decides to go for custody, as everyone has been predicting."Another East Hampton resident said: "I was on the beach several days ago when I heard her crying and yelling. The people she was with tried to calm her down but finally they had to take her home."Beatrice flew into Heather’s arms when the former topless model arrived to collect her. The child is now staying at a rented house near East Hampton with her 38-year-old mother, who flew to the New York area after a trip to Los Angeles.Asked about Beatrice’s tantrums, Heather’s representative, Phil Hall, said: "I am not aware of the incidents but it is a difficult time for the family."
Daily Mail
I hope he gets custody of Beatrice.
|
|
Heather Mills poses nude again |
| August 27th, 2006 under Paul McCartney/Heather Mills. [ Comments: none ]
|
|
HEATHER Mills stripped off for an amazing erotic calendar shoot at the lodge on her estranged husband’s estate.It was just three weeks ago when the 38-year-old former model summoned a trusted photographer to the picturesque lakeside retreat at Peasmarsh, East Sussex, where she has been staying since her separation from Sir Paul McCartney.Sir Paul was away in London at the time.The lodge used to be one of the couple’s favourite places, where they shared quiet, intimate moments together. She peeled off her clothes and struck a series of different poses. There were 12 in all and Heather wore a different wig as she recreated images of Hollywood icons, including Marilyn Monroe.The shots – which Heather hoped would form part of a calendar for animal charity PETA’s I Would Rather Go Naked Than Wear Fur campaign – are said to be "sensational", with her proudly displaying her new lithe form honed from almost daily visits to the gym. Everyone involved was sworn to secrecy.Last night a source said: "Heather wasn’t remotely embarrassed. It’s a photographer she has worked with for years and, remember, she has posed naked before. "She looked amazing and is justifiably incredibly proud of her body. And she wanted to show that, despite the stressful time she has been going through, she is determined to carry on with her life."She wanted to do something vivacious and sexy and this seemed like a perfect idea."The photographs were initially to be used for the 2007 calender for PETA, which Heather has long been a dedicated campaigner for.Her spokesman confirmed: "They are not lewd photographs. They are quite arty. Other celebrities have posed for nude calendar shots before for PETA. Heather hopes they will be used for a campaign for PETA in 2007 or 2008." But last night it appeared Heather had decided to put the project on hold during her divorce.A friend revealed: "Heather has decided that at such a sensitive time it’s not a good idea to be seen in such seemingly frivolous photographs."She has now instructed the photographer not to release them for the time being.
Daily Mirror
What a bitch to use his house. You know these pictures are going to leak out soon.
|
|
Sir Paul pays off Heather Mill’s charity |
| August 24th, 2006 under Paul McCartney/Heather Mills. [ Comments: none ]
|
|
Sir Paul McCartney is to make a substantial donation to the Adopt-a-Minefield charity after his split from wife Heather caused him to pull out of a benefit gala.The former Beatle will give a reported £1.6 million to the organisation.He was due to perform at the annual fundraising event in Los Angeles in October.The McCartneys are patrons of the charity and have jointly hosted the star-studded gala for the past five years, with a performance by Sir Paul the main attraction.But Sir Paul, 64, pulled out last month and the event has been cancelled.The charity confirmed he had offered to make a donation, but stressed he was under no obligation to pay compensation for his missed performance.Keith Kelly, director of Adopt-a-Minefield UK, said: "This is not compensation and we have not asked for any money."Paul is not under any legal obligation but he has offered to make a donation."He wanted to do this because he realises that not having the event this year is a big financial blow to us. The event has been cancelled because losing Paul at such short notice meant it was very difficult for us to replace him."We have not yet received a cheque so I have no idea how much he will give. The event normally raises 1.5 million dollars (£792,000) to two million dollars (£1,056,000). Whether Paul is thinking of matching that or not, I can’t say."
Daily Snack
The charity will probally go under without him because no one cares about them without him.
|
|
Paul McCartney removes Heather’s fugly pictures from his photo book? |
| August 22nd, 2006 under Paul McCartney/Heather Mills. [ Comments: none ]
|
|
For Sir Paul McCartney it was one of the most momentous days of the year – made even more special by the presence of his trusted brother.Headlining the world’s biggest concert, his younger sibling, Mike, was on hand to capture every moment as Live 8’s unofficial photographer.But now, with the exclusive photo diary about to go to press, one prominent backstage guest is conspicuous by her absence – Sir Paul’s estranged wife, Heather Mills.While the 38-year-old former model does appear in some select snaps, she has, intriguingly been cut out of the rest.On the ex-Beatle’s personal website, which promotes Mike McCartney’s Live8 Coolpix book, Miss Mills has been left out of all testimonials – and omitted from the named list of celebrities who do appear. Instead, guests including Sir Bob Geldof, Madonna, Joss Stone, David Walliams and even Jeremy Clarkson are named, while McCartney’s estranged wife – who was a vociferous figure on the day – goes unmentioned.’The book has been put together really well, it’s a very classy affair but the only problem, from the brothers’ point of view, was Heather, because she and Paul are no longer an item.’Given that they’ve had such a public, acrimonious split, any photos of them published now, showing them kissing, cuddling and giggling like teenagers would simply look ridiculous.’Not only that, but such pictures immediately date the book and takes away from what Mike is trying to do with this special project – further the philanthropic work of Bob Geldof, Midge Ure and all the performers, including Paul, who gave up their time for free.
Daily Mail
And seriously who is she anyways? The only picture book worth having her in, is her sex book. And I pity the poor fool who bought that book.
|
|
Heather Mills has a new enemy…dairy. |
| August 21st, 2006 under Paul McCartney/Heather Mills. [ Comments: none ]
|
|
SIRPAUL MCCARTNEY’s estranged wife HEATHER MILLS is facing possible court action after slamming Britain’s National Dairy Council in an interview. The former model and animal rights activist voiced her furious opinions in this month’s (AUG06) Allergy magazine, accusing the organisation of trying to cover up the link between cancer and dairy products. Vegan Mills says, "The dairy council is currently quoting one scientific review that shows no increased risk of breast cancer from eating dairy products, but they might even protect against it. In fact it clearly says that some dairy products may increase the risk of cancer. "It simply ignored the bits it didn’t like and misquoted the others." The NDC are furious at Mills’ potentially libellous claims, saying, "We’ve contacted the magazine and they’ve agreed to print a strong letter in the next edition."
Contact Music
Doesn’t being such an uptight bitch cause rectal cancer? Just a guess?
|
| « Previous entries Next entries » |
|
|