|
Picture proof Nicole Kidman is not pregnant |
| October 13th, 2006 under Keith & Nicole Urban. [ Comments: none ]
|
|
Any rumours that Nicole Kidman is pregnant were quashed today when she appeared at a film festival looking stick-thin. The actress looked as if she had caught the Hollywood Size Zero bug. There was no sign of the fuller stomach that was pictured several times over summer, prompting speculation she was expecting a child with her musician husband Keith Urban. However, today she looked waiflike in a sleeveless silk top and skintight black skirt. Rumours of her pregnancy had been flying around ever since she married Urban, 38, in June. She continuously denied the speculation and even accused US magazine New Deal of using altered pictures to make her look as if she was expecting. Kidman, 39, was pictured in Rome for the premiere of her new movie Fur, which is based loosely on the life of photographer Diane Arbus. It was shown at the inaugural Rome Film Festival, which has attracted a number of Hollywood stars including Sean Connery, Leonardo DiCaprio and Richard Gere. Opening the event, Kidman said: "I love Italy, and I feel great affinity with it." She recently admitted she is considering having plastic surgery – but only on television. The actress is being lined up to make a rare TV appearance in an upcoming episode of medical drama Nip/Tuck, according to reports in America. But she will be losing her familiar stunning looks for the show and is set to be made unrecognisable with prosthetics and makeup. Kidman had approached the drama’s creator, Ryan Murphy, about securing a cameo role, he said.
Daily Mail
I guess it was all the Southern food she was eating that helped her to put on a little weight.
|
|
Nicole Kidman to guest star on Nip/Tuck? |
| October 11th, 2006 under Keith & Nicole Urban, Nip/Tuck. [ Comments: none ]
|
|
Oscar winner Nicole Kidman is being lined up to appear in an upcoming episode of TV show Nip/Tuck. Kidman approached the drama’s creator Ryan Murphy about securing a cameo role. Murphy says, "She said, ‘I want to do the show but I want to wear lots of scary prosthetics.’"
Hollywood
Didn’t she already do that for that movie she won the Oscar for?
|
|
Nicole Kidman says she is not pregnant |
| October 5th, 2006 under Keith & Nicole Urban. [ Comments: none ]
|
|
RECENTLY married Nicole Kidman, 39, has finally denied rumours that she is carrying Keith Urban’s baby. "I am not pregnant – I will say right now I am not pregnant," the Aussie, who has two children with ex Tom Cruise, told Heart 106.2.
3am
Hopefully she will be soon!
|
|
Does Nicole Kidman look pregnant here? |
| September 15th, 2006 under Keith & Nicole Urban. [ Comments: none ]
|
|
Nicole Kidman will have trouble dispelling rumours that she is pregnant after her tummy gave a starring display outside a cinema in Los Angeles. A suspicious-looking bump protruded from underneath her jumper as the 39-year-old actress left the building accompanied by her mother-in-law. When she spotted photographers, she quickly glanced at her belly and rearranged her top to cover it, before giving a wry smile. With behaviour like this, the Kidman baby debate shows no signs of relenting. One thing’s for sure, she has certainly been keeping herself busy recently. She is currently filming The Golden Compass, the adaptation of the first of author Philip Pullman’s Dark Materials trilogy at Shepperton studios. She has been staying in the Dorchester Hotel in Mayfair with husband Keith Urban. Kidman then jetted off to Rome to film a television advert before heading to the US – a hectic schedule for anyone, let alone a pregnant woman. She married Urban in June in Sydney following an 18-month-long romance after meeting him at an Australian awards dinner in Los Angeles in January 2005. She already has two children, Isabella, 13, and Connor, 11, whom she adopted while married to Tom Cruise. Her camp have been forced to deny she is pregnant practically ever since the wedding day, and last month even accused US magazine New Deal of using altered pictures to make the star look like she was expecting. But any more pictures like this and her PR people might soon find they have a more difficult job on their hands.
Daily Mail
I am not sure if I see it, but then again I am not sure I do not?
|
|
Eyes Wide Shut left Nicole Kidman’s Eyes Wide Open |
| September 2nd, 2006 under Keith & Nicole Urban, Tom Cruise/Katie Holmes/Suri. [ Comments: none ]
|
|
Sexy thriller Eyes Wide Shut ended Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman’s marriage because the couple’s characters were too close for comfort, according to a new Kidman biography. In his new study, Nicole Kidman, film historian David Thomson claims the former couple held a mirror up to their relationship issues when they signed up for the 1999 Stanley Kubrick film. Thomson says, "I think she learned from him just what was required in taking charge of yourself. That’s what broke them up. "She realized she could be as big as him if she became as strong and self-centered. He wanted a beautiful, bright, obedient consort. She wanted a teacher. It worked. Then it stopped. "I think Eyes Wide Shut was the process that brought it to an end because the characters they played were so close to themselves."
I was lucky enough to see this movie in a theater that served alcohol and it still could not make it tolerable. I always say that Kubrick died after seeing this movie because he was too embarrassed to be alive when it came out.
|
| « Previous entries Next entries » |
|
|