Paul McCartney wrote a song about marriage woes over a year ago |
September 10th, 2006 under Paul McCartney/Heather Mills. [ Comments: none ]
|
TROUBLED Sir Paul McCartney sang of his failing marriage more than A YEAR before he and Heather Mills split.The former Beatle recorded Riding To Vanity Fair in Los Angeles last spring. Now friends have revealed how the song – which featured on Macca’s CD Chaos And Creation In The Backyard – is a thinly-veiled comment on the couple’s unravelling marriage.And it shows how Macca was convinced their romance was collapsing because Heather had humiliated him, refused his bids to repair their friendship and preferred publicity to love.In one line, distraught Macca sings: "I was open to friendship but you didn’t seem to have any to spare/While you were riding to Vanity Fair."The revelation comes a week after it was revealed Paul and Heather had held a "peace summit" to discuss their separation at the singer’s US home in the Hamptons.One friend revealed: "All Paul’s emotions and troubles because of the marriage to Heather are in that song."He is saying how the love has gone out of their relationship. And he is putting the blame squarely on Heather."The song – published by Macca’s MPL Communications – was recorded at the world-famous Ocean Way Recording Studio in Los Angeles last March and April. It is believed to have been written by Macca, 64, two months before. The friend added: "In the song, Paul tells Heather how she has humiliated him and treated him like a fool."But the song says she turned down the chance – because she was more interested in publicity. Paul was using the US magazine Vanity Fair to symbolise her love of the limelight generally."A close friend said: "Paul’s frustrations in the marriage were boiling for a long time."Not long after they married, Heather seemed to become more interested in being in the limelight than being with him. This song just demonstrates how low he felt for some time before they split." The album – made with Radiohead producer Nigel Godrich – was released last September. It made it to No 10 in the UK charts and No 6 in the US and was hailed as a return to form for the ex-Beatle.Speaking of the song at the time, Paul would only say it was about "certain instances that were hurtful, where the hand of friendship was rejected".At the time the show business world overlooked the poignant lyrics believing that 38-year-old Heather and Paul – who wed in June 2002 – were still happy. The friend added: "Paul has been renowned for heartfelt lyrics ever since the early days of The Beatles."At the time of the album’s release no one considered the song may be about his marriage – and Paul wasn’t going to announce it. Suffice it to say, though, that Heather will have known the song was all about her."The Sunday Mirror revealed back in May how Sir Paul had walked out on Heather because he was fed up of being a "doormat".
Daily Mail
The more and more we learn about her the more and more we see what a b!tch she is!
|
Paul McCartney offers Heather Mills $40 million for her silence? |
September 9th, 2006 under Paul McCartney/Heather Mills. [ Comments: none ]
|
ROCK legend Sir Paul McCartney has offered Heather Mills a £40 million divorce deal to buy her silence, the News of the World can reveal. He will pay the money over 20 years and in return she must keep quiet about what went wrong in their marriage for the rest of his life. Macca, 64, who is worth about £825 million, came up with the deal as the mud-slinging between the pair eased. A source close to the couple said: "They are thrashing out a deal which would amount to between £30 million and £40 million over 20 years and there will be strict conditions. "Heather must reveal nothing about their personal lives… no books, no TV specials. "She has one hell of a story and Paul wants a settlement to make sure it never comes out. "Heather has no intention of telling it because she knows it would only hurt their daughter Bea, but it would always be lurking in the background. "Any breach of the conditions would allow him to stop the payments — so basically he has control of Heather for the rest of his life. "There’s a long way to go but it looks like that will form the basis of the settlement." "I don’t think there is a chance that they will get back together but the war is over. "They have reached a new stage in their relationship where they can talk, be around each other and co-operate in the best way for Bea. It’s a huge relief for both of them." A source close to Macca, who is planning a world tour next year, said: "He really hopes this latest move will see the end of it and give them both a chance to get on with their lives."
News of the World
I doubt she will take it because she will want more.
|
Heather Mills first husband says she deserves nothing |
September 8th, 2006 under Paul McCartney/Heather Mills. [ Comments: none ]
|
Heather Mills does not deserve a penny out of her divorce from Sir Paul McCartney, her first husband has said.Alfie Kamal told the Evening Standard he was not surprised the marriage had collapsed in acrimony. He had issued a "Buyer Beware" warning when the former Beatle began dating Ms Mills and his prediction of disaster had finally come true." We have both been Heathered," he said. "If there is anything I have in common with Sir Paul it’s probably that."Mr Kamal, whose marriage to Ms Mills ended when she left him for a ski instructor, added: "I’m not really surprised the marriage is over. Our marriage lasted just under two years – we had been together for five years off and on. But she ran off lots of times."It was a bit like the Runaway Bride. I used to think she had a permanent pair of sneakers on under her shoes. She always ran away. If you had an argument with her she would run away. When you caught her out lying she would run away."I don’t know the details of why their marriage has broken down but from what I can make out they cannot bear to be in the same room together. That’s how it goes with her. You get to a point where you start to hate her and hate the way she is."Mr Kamal, a wealthy businessman, said Ms Mills, a former model, should not receive any money from Sir Paul, whose estimated fortune is £825million."I don’t think anybody deserves to lose hundreds of millions of pounds," he said, "I don’t agree with divorce laws. Somebody who has made a significant amount of money from his own talents should not have to pay out huge sums just because a couple were once married."It should all be based on contribution – what you take out, you should have put in. If she took out of the marriage what she put in she would walk out with minus a million bucks."Mr Kamal wed Ms Mills, 10 years his junior, at All Saints Catholic Church in Harrow in 1989. But he says she walked out after falling for the ski instructor on holiday in Slovenia.He added: "I got off quite cheap. That is because she had ulterior motives and wanted to run off with the ski instructor and just needed enough money to go and live with him."During their marriage she had suffered two ectopic pregnancies, which had put their relationship under considerable strain.Mr Kamal met Ms Mills when she was a teenager working in a café in London. He fell in love and after several break-ups they married and set up home in a five bedroom house with a pool in Hoddesdon, Hertfordshire. Mr Kamal takes credit for encouraging Ms Mills to pursue a career in modelling. The businessman had two children from a previous marriage. She has said in the past that she was probably more in love with the children than with Mr Kamal.Mr Kamal, 48, has another two children by his latest marriage and now lives happily in Vancouver, Canada.
Daily Mail
I love when he says that they have both been Heathered!
|
Heather Mills gets a free place to stay |
September 6th, 2006 under Paul McCartney/Heather Mills. [ Comments: none ]
|
HEATHER Mills can thank her ultra-rich Hollywood pals for her quality time in the Hamptons this past weekend – she had the use of a stunning oceanfront home in Amagansett and didn’t pay a dime for it, Page Six has learned.Earlier this week, it was reported that Mills was shelling out close to $80,000 for a weeklong Hamptons rental so she could be near Beatrice, her 2-year-old daughter with Paul McCartney.But in fact, McCartney’s soon-to-be-ex-wife had been in Los Angeles doing business last month when her close pal, producer-director Dennis Erdman, whose credits include "Gilmore Girls" and "Grosse Pointe," offered her use of the Amagansett home he shares with his boyfriend, Darren Star, creator of "Sex and the City," for the long Labor Day holiday."We are working on many animal campaigns together, and I thought it would be a good opportunity to further discuss some of our plans," Erdman, an avid animal rights campaigner, told Page Six.
Page Six
They probaly are John Lennon fans!
|
Heather Mills and her lawyer |
September 5th, 2006 under Paul McCartney/Heather Mills. [ Comments: none ]
|
Striding out side by side, this is Heather Mills pictured for the first time with her lawyer – the man who famously represented Princess Diana.Eyes hidden beneath her trademark sunglasses, and clad in five-inch high wedges, the 38-year-old activist emerged from an intense 3-hour legal consultation.Looking just a little worn down by his demanding client, Anthony Julius – Mishcon de Reya’s acclaimed senior consultant – escorted Miss Mills out of the London office and into a waiting cab.Of course, for £500 an hour, a little personal service never goes amiss.Miss Mills’ meeting is the latest development in her acrimonious divorce battle with Sir Paul McCartney.When the 64-year-old former Beatle took on Fiona Shackleton, who represented Prince Charles during his 1996 divorce from the Princess of Wales, Miss Mills retaliated by employing the services of 50-year-old Julius – the man responsible for Diana’s £17.5 million settlement.
Daily Mail
I wonder where she is getting the money to pay for his services?
|
« Previous entries Next entries » |
|
|