Seriously? OMG! WTF? » Nicole Kidman most likely not preggers
header image
[ # ] Nicole Kidman most likely not preggers
November 29th, 2006 under Keith & Nicole Urban

The tabloids are full of stories speculating that Nicole Kidman is pregnant. The "evidence" seems to be a slightly enlarged midsection that comes and goes in paparazzi photos. Well, kids, my sources who know Nicole and know the score say it’s highly unlikely. "First do the math," says a source, "Nicole and [husband] Keith Urban haven’t been together that much recently. He’s going to be in rehab for a while longer in California. She’s making a movie in London." Then my insiders point out that Kidman has a very heavy film schedule set in stone for 2007. She starts Baz Luhrmann’s "Australia" in about three months, when — if the rumors were true — she’d be five months along. "Australia" has already been postponed once, and it’s not going to happen again. Kidman also has two or more projects which will be announced soon, I am told. There’s no time for kids.

Fox411

Oh well, until the next time it is rumored.

Share


website stats Google Analytics Alternative
Web
Analytics Made Easy - StatCounter